Energy and climate initiatives underperform for structural reasons. We help organizations understand what is driving outcomes and make better decisions.

We work with programme leaders and fund managers on energy transition and climate finance initiatives where progress is uneven, results are unclear, or decisions are hard to make.

See our work
Governance and institutions Capital and risk allocation Energy conversion and grid Material flows and system inertia

Where we typically get involved

We work with programme leaders, implementing partners, fund managers, and public-sector institutions working on energy transition and climate finance.

01

When a programme stalls and nobody can explain why

You launched a programme, the market did not respond, or procurement stalled despite good preparation. The binding constraint shifted from technical readiness to something else: tariff uncertainty, approval pathways, institutional capability. We diagnose where things are actually stuck and help structure the response.

02

When a portfolio loses coherence

A climate or energy portfolio across multiple partners, countries, or funding streams has outgrown its coordination systems. Decision-makers cannot see what is working, what is stuck, or where to act. We restructure tracking and coordination so the portfolio becomes decision-ready.

03

When the trade-offs are political, not technical

The analysis exists. The strategy is written. But decisions are stuck because different parts of the system want different things. Teams understand the dynamics but default to siloed responses under pressure. We provide senior advisory support and structured decision environments that surface the real constraints.

We think in systems. We design for outcomes.

Most advisory work treats complex situations as though they are merely complicated: many parts, but solvable with enough expertise applied in the right order. Some situations are like that.

But the initiatives Momentum works on are usually complex. They involve multiple organizations with different priorities, dynamics that take time to become visible, and institutional pressures that interact in ways that resist simple responses. The challenge is not a lack of effort. It is a lack of clarity about what is actually driving outcomes.

We start by mapping how things really work in practice, not how they were designed to work. We identify what matters most. Then we help design structures, coordination systems, and decision processes that address those dynamics directly.

AI accelerates our research, synthesis, and analytical work. Judgment stays human.

Selected work

Systems Diagnosis

A Decision Simulation of Energy Transition Failure

What repeated simulation reveals about decision-making under constraint in energy transition programmes.

Read the case note →

Framework

A practical model for understanding donor-funded programs

How political incentives, narrative requirements, and institutional dynamics shape what donor-funded programs can deliver. Adapted from selectorate theory and experience inside donor-funded energy and climate programs.

Read the framework →

Learning Note

How Energy Transition Programmes Evolve Under Constraint

How binding constraints shaped adaptive programming in Indonesia’s Diesel Replacement Programme.

Read the learning note →

Dealing with a complex initiative or unclear portfolio?

If you are working on an initiative that is not delivering as expected, a portfolio that lacks visibility, or a transition challenge that needs better structure, let us discuss it. Typical starting points include reviewing a complex initiative, making sense of a fragmented portfolio, or working through a specific decision.

Discuss your situation